Why Your UI Test Automation Strategy May Need an Upgrade
26 Nov, 20245 minutesThe Shift in UI Test Automation Frameworks: Industry Trends Redefining the FutureThe landsca...
The Shift in UI Test Automation Frameworks: Industry Trends Redefining the Future
The landscape of UI test automation is rapidly changing as businesses strive to meet the increasing demands of fast-paced software development. With a greater emphasis on speed, reliability, and scalability, companies are rethinking their approach to testing tools and frameworks. This evolution is driven by a clear shift toward newer, more efficient technologies—especially with the rise of frameworks like Playwright, Selenium, and Cypress.
In this blog, we’ll explore the latest trends shaping the future of UI test automation. From the rising adoption of popular frameworks to their broader impact, we’ll examine what these changes mean for developers, QA teams, and the software industry as a whole.
Our insights are drawn from a recent survey conducted by a leading organisation in the QA industry. While the data provides a valuable snapshot of current trends, it’s worth noting that no dataset is without limitations. Despite this, the findings offer a robust starting point for understanding the present and future of UI test automation.
So, let’s dive into the key trends in framework adoption and uncover their implications for the evolving software landscape.
Framework Adoption: The Numbers and the Nuance
Recent data reveals a reshaping of the UI test automation landscape:
- Playwright: 36%
- Selenium: 25%
- Cypress: 16%
- WebdriverIO: 2%
Notably, 18% of organisations use multiple frameworks, often combining Playwright, Selenium, and Cypress. Playwright’s rise reflects its modern feature set and developer-first design, but these numbers only tell part of the story. Tool adoption often depends as much on team expertise, legacy systems, and project demands as on technical capabilities.
Playwright: A Modern Favourite
Playwright has become the go-to choice for teams modernising their UI automation efforts. Its advantages include:
- Ease of Use: Streamlined setup and intuitive APIs lower adoption barriers.
- Comprehensive Browser Support: Native compatibility with Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox simplifies testing across platforms.
- Performance and Speed: Optimised execution times outperform older tools.
- Future-Ready Features: Capabilities like network interception and built-in tracing meet the needs of today’s dynamic applications.
However, Playwright’s success also raises questions about its potential role in reinforcing a reliance on UI-heavy testing. Could its simplicity lead teams to neglect other layers like API or service-level testing, which often provide better value?
Selenium: Transitioning Veteran
Selenium’s long-standing presence in test automation has positioned it as a reliable choice for legacy projects. However, its declining popularity (now at 25%) reflects challenges such as:
- Outdated Architecture: Increasingly complex setups and less intuitive workflows compared to modern tools.
- Performance Bottlenecks: Slower execution, particularly in large test suites.
- Higher Maintenance Costs: Managing Selenium frameworks can be resource intensive.
Despite this, many teams continue using Selenium due to familiarity, existing investments, or integration with older systems. As one QA lead observed, transitioning away from Selenium requires not only technical effort but also retraining teams to write better test logic and assertions—areas where even experienced users can struggle.
Cypress: A Developer’s Ally
Cypress, with 16% adoption, retains a strong following among teams focused on JavaScript-heavy applications. Its strengths include:
- Developer-Centric Features: Real-time feedback and debugging capabilities.
- Front-End Focus: Excellent support for frameworks like React and Angular.
- Community and Ecosystem: A robust network of users driving continuous innovation.
Many organisations are pairing Cypress with Playwright, leveraging Cypress for legacy projects while adopting Playwright for new initiatives. This dual-framework approach offers flexibility but also reflects the challenges of transitioning entire teams and projects to newer tools.
Beyond Tools: The Real Challenges
While the rise of frameworks like Playwright and Cypress is noteworthy, QA leads emphasise that tool selection is only part of the equation. Many teams underestimate the expertise required to build robust test suites. Some key concerns include:
- Team Skill Gaps: Writing optimal test logic, particularly in JavaScript/TypeScript or Node.js, is a hurdle for many teams. Without strong programming skills, even advanced tools can fail to deliver value.
- Focus on UI Layer: Over-reliance on UI testing can neglect other layers, such as API or unit testing, which are often more cost-effective and reliable.
- Misaligned Expectations: The belief that UI automation significantly reduces testing costs can lead to disillusionment when tools don’t meet expectations.
Emerging Trends and Predictions
The current landscape points to several key trends shaping the future of UI test automation:
- Playwright’s Dominance: Its share is likely to grow as more teams adopt its modern capabilities.
- Selenium’s Decline: While still viable for legacy systems, Selenium is expected to further cede ground to Playwright and Cypress for new projects.
- Cypress’s Niche: Its role as a front-end testing tool will remain strong, particularly for JavaScript-heavy applications.
- Multi-Framework Strategies: Organisations will continue combining tools to balance legacy support with modern testing needs.
Conclusion: Adapting to Change
The world of UI test automation is changing fast, with the push for faster, more reliable tools driving the shift. Playwright is making waves as a modern, all-in-one solution that meets today’s testing needs. Selenium, while still a go-to for many, is starting to take a backseat as newer, more user-friendly options come into play. And let’s not forget Cypress—still a favourite among developers for front-end testing.
For teams figuring out their next steps, it’s all about finding the right fit. Whether that’s diving into Playwright, sticking with tried-and-true Selenium, or mixing and matching frameworks, the goal is to keep delivering quality software without missing a beat.
The testing landscape is evolving, but with a bit of adaptability and a focus on what works best for your team, you’ll be ready to tackle whatever comes next in UI test automation.
Transform Your Testing Team with MRJ Recruitment
The evolution of UI test automation is reshaping the future of software development. To meet these challenges, you need more than just tools—you need a partner with a proven track record in connecting exceptional QA talent to both emerging and established enterprises.
At MRJ Recruitment, we take pride in our dedicated Testing & QA team, renowned across the industry for delivering tangible results. Whether you're building from the ground up or enhancing an existing team, we specialise in matching world-class talent with organisations poised for growth.
We’re also proud to host MCR.Test, one of the hottest QA and Testing meetups in the North West, bringing together industry professionals to discuss, learn, and shape the future of testing. Visit our events page to explore past meetups, news, and upcoming sessions!
From Junior to Senior Test Automation Engineers to QA Specialists experienced in modern frameworks like Playwright, Selenium, and Cypress, we’ve helped businesses stay ahead of the curve. Our reputation for excellence is built on delivering talent that doesn’t just fill roles but drives innovation.
For more information, connect with our QA Specialist, Cameron Whitwam, or visit our Testing insights page.
📩 Let’s redefine your future with the right talent. Contact us today!